|
1/7/2005 2:55:00 PM
|
|
1/7/2005 3:09:00 PM
|
|
1/7/2005 3:14:00 PM
I haven't looked at your links but there's a major problem:
India and Pakistan test their nukes on the OTHER end of the subcontinent.
|
|
1/7/2005 3:19:00 PM
^ dough!
Another conspiracy theory quashed by rationale thought.
NEXT!
ps - in all fairness, this one is not based on supernatural or paranormal intervention. scientifically, such a thing COULD happen. logistically, it's highly less probable than an actual earthquake/tsunami combo.
|
|
1/7/2005 3:37:00 PM
How did I know you three would be first in my thread?
Starck, WHERE on the " other end of the sub-continent"?
Kev, I will never tire of your cries of anti-semitism, really I won't. I especially love how you can make ANYTHING anti-semitic.
Engineer, perhaps it is less likely, however tsunamis are NOT known to have ever happened in this part of the world, nor was there any prior seismic activity before the quake, HIGHLY unlikely considering the magnitude of the quake.
------------------------sHiFt WaS hErE----------------------
|
|
1/7/2005 3:38:00 PM
'Jewish matza is made from Arab blood'
no - that's not anti-semitic at all
bwahahhahahaha
|
|
1/7/2005 3:52:00 PM
|
|
1/7/2005 5:55:00 PM
Actually it was space aliens.
BIG ONES!!!.
|
|
1/8/2005 2:16:00 AM
^C'mon, space aliens?! Now you're just being silly.
Now back to the Jews and their Tsunami-making anti-gravity bombs.
|
|
1/8/2005 6:01:00 AM
gone overboard again shift...
i've been back in japan for a day and i've already experienced an earthquake. (very small one)
earthquakes happen quite often in this region.
|
|
1/8/2005 11:16:00 AM
By the other end of the subcontinent I mean the north end -- as in, the opposite end from the south end where the epicentre (NOT hypocentre) occurred.
Pakistanespecially, has damn few opportunities to test nukes thousands of kilometres south of their territory.
Besides, engineerf is absolutely correct; the seismic profile of a nuclear explosion is not at all like a natural earthquake.
Another gaping hole: the energy released by the earthquake causing this tsunami is equivalent to a bomb in the GIGATONS. The largest H-bomb ever tested was a Soviet 60-megaton device in the 1960s. There is no bomb in creation with remotely enough power to cause this tsunami.
Would you care for me to find any more holes? I can spend a minute or two more if you like, and point out a few more truck-sized ones.
|
|
1/8/2005 12:16:00 PM
How about triggering Plate movement with NEWKEWLAR products....
|
|
1/8/2005 12:40:00 PM
It would be like trying to use ice cubes to shift concrete blocks.
|
|
1/8/2005 1:21:00 PM
|
|
1/8/2005 4:02:00 PM
Guam where what?
|
|
1/8/2005 5:15:00 PM
It would be like trying to use ice cubes to shift concrete blocks.
What would?
Earthquakes are known to interact with the ionosphere (the atmosphere 50-373 miles above the earth's surface). The Tang Shan earthquake in China on 28 July 1976, left 650,000 people dead. The catastrophic event was preceded by an airglow, said to have been caused by Soviet ELF wave experiments to heat the ionosphere.
The San Francisco earthquake was preceded by unusual ultra low frequency waves, detected in California on 12 September 1989. These waves grew in intensity and finally subsided on 5 October. On 17 October they appeared again, with signals so strong that they went off the scale. Three hours later, the earthquake took place.
A Washington Times report in March 1992 said satellites and ground sensors detected mysterious radio waves or related electrical and magnetic activity before major earthquakes in Southern California, Armenia, Japan and Northern California between 1986 and 1989.
The earthquake that hit Los Angeles on 17 January 1994 was also preceded by unusual radio waves and two sonic booms.
These strange occurences have never been explained and to me it would seem highly probable that some of these earthquakes have been a result of human activity such as HAARP, and not natural causes.
Perhaps it DOES come down to your skill, as the ubiquitous one has said, "with the icecube"
---------------------sHifT wAs hErE----------------------
|
|
1/8/2005 5:26:00 PM
There is no bomb in creation with remotely enough power to cause this tsunami.
This should really read :
I THINK there is no KNOWN "bomb" OR DEVICE with remotely enough power to cause this tsunami.
Because, really, we have NO FXCKING CLUE, myself included.
-------------------sHiFt WaS hErE---------------
|
|
1/8/2005 8:04:00 PM
Oh, dude, lay off the paranoia.
You're honestly suggesting that someone, sorry, fuçking INDIA, has a weapon 40 times more powerful than the highest yield device ever exploded? That's bloody ludicrous.
Even if they did, what conceivable use could this ludicrous weapon have? There is absolutely no reasonable application for that degree of force. In case you have been too busy popping your paranoia pills to pay attention to what is actually developing in the advanced weapons fields, the latest nuclear weapons are very LOW YIELD devices -- as low as single tons, not gigatons.
This was a magnitude 9.0 Richter earthquake, which is a seriously exceptional amount of force for the PLANET to wield. It was not I repeat NOT a military exercise, and to declare that it is is to do the victims of this catastrophe a disservice by fostering fear and paranoia about the countries in that area of the globe.
Oh yeah, dude: remember, the seismic profile was -- ready for this? -- AN EARTHQUAKE, NOT AN EXPLOSION. A weapon of this magnitude would result in a tsunami of headlines declaring it's the biggest explosion in history. This is clearly not the case -- so drop the idea.
|
|
1/8/2005 8:35:00 PM
Never ONCE did I PERSONALLY suggest that this was anything other than an earthquake! The links I posted suggest that perhaps nuclear testing was responsible FOR the earthquake.
The comments I made suggest the same thing, that perhaps there are ways unknown to us that can cause earthquakes or other phenomenon to occur on demand.
Read the HAARP papers if you don't believe it. Why is it so far fetched to you?
And you may be right about the latest nuclear weapons, I don't know, but is nuclear all there is? I doubt it.
-------------------sHiFt WaS hErE-----------------
|
|
1/9/2005 1:19:00 AM
"Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like it's from Neptune."
-Noam Chomsky
----------------------sHiFt WaS hErE---------------------
|
|
1/9/2005 1:26:00 AM
Just because something sounds like it's from Neptune, doesn't make it true.
|