|
1/27/2005 1:22:00 PM
Thats a really profound statement you idiot - where were you 2 years ago?
|
|
1/27/2005 1:49:00 PM
|
|
1/27/2005 2:22:00 PM
Apparently some American pundits are that stupid and naive as well. I was watching this show on CBC yesterday, and there are tons of people who believe that 1) Saddam is linked to al-qeada 2) weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.
Also, this supposed expert on Fox News was 100% damn sure that Canada sent troops to Vietnam, challenged the interviewer, and said she'd look into it and get back to him.
And no, she never got back to him.
|
|
1/27/2005 2:40:00 PM
the pundit was probably confused by the fact that many canadians fought in vietnam after joining the u.s. army.
was it ann coulter? please say it was.
|
|
1/27/2005 3:53:00 PM
^ that program on cbc yesterday.......yes it was anne coulter that thought that the canadian goverment had sent the troups to vietnam...when the interviewer corrected her she still didn't believe him.That program also showed bill o'reilly cheerleading the invasion of iraq.
|
|
1/27/2005 4:21:00 PM
that must have been the interview she did with evan solomon. i heard about that. would like to have seen it.
ann coulter doesn't seem to understand the difference between facts and ideology.
|
|
1/27/2005 4:27:00 PM
|
|
1/27/2005 4:31:00 PM
the program also featured rachel marsden...(.the one who stalked liam donnelly the s.f.u. swim coach) ......she now a "conservative" journalist with her own radio program.rachel basically said,"ofcourse there were alqaeda members and weapons of mass destruction in iraq and that's a great reason to go to war."
|
|
1/27/2005 5:14:00 PM
who said they don't count? if they didn't count, saddam wouldn't be on trialby an iraqi court.
the question isn't whether saddam killed iraqis during his 2+ decades in power, it's whether more harm has been and/or will be done as a result of his having been removed from power by a foreign army that most iraqis are suspicious of and a large segment of the population is contemptuous of. as events in iraq demonstrate daily, the choice wasn't between a despotic dictatorship and a garden of flowering western-style democracy. the choice was between a dictatorship that provided electricity and a reasonable standard of living to most of its citizens (those who weren't killed for opposing it) and the chaos of occupation and daily resistance to it.
|
|
1/27/2005 7:02:00 PM
another quick question....can a sea stallion carry 36 armed troops?
curious....
Lets try not to ferget that father bush armed Saddam....are we too fzxkin stupid to remmember Donnal Rumsfeld shakin hands with his buddy Saddam?
As well.....
Lets take a look at how many of the Bush family have profited by investing in an enemy of the American state for which the Bush family sent sons fathers cousins brothers to be killed by an enemy put into power and armed financed and trained by yankee and other wwestern firms....
Such viscious cycles shouldn't be that hard to understand....
was it prescott sheldon bush (1863-1948) or
was it Samuel Prescott bush (1895-1972)
who managed Nazi corporations and had yankees funding and giving the Nazis raw materials to build the "Blitzkrieg" and their IBM techs to sort the Culling....
lol....spincycle what?
|
|
1/27/2005 7:09:00 PM
|
|
1/27/2005 7:44:00 PM
www.sikorsky.com/file/popup/1,,185,00.pdf
very nice aircraft....bad weather eh....lol
|
|
1/27/2005 9:25:00 PM
|
|
1/27/2005 10:47:00 PM
yuppers
answered that question after I checked out the sikorsky sight....
Jolly green jiant is a big ass mofo.....
this **** would require one hail of a bad ass rock tornado to bring down....
never mind the automated terain following capabilities it has and multiple redundancy in survivability with its Three engines and fuel systems...
In basic.....a flying tank....
**** asside...RIP marines...
|
|
1/27/2005 10:48:00 PM
I asked the question thinking this was the yank varient of our sea king...
|
|
1/28/2005 11:13:00 AM
Thats funny.I guess the hundreds of thousands that died under Sadam dont count?
if the amercicans wanted to stop those killings why did they sell sadam the weapons in the 80's..... or.....go into rwanda to prevent the massacre of 500,000-600,000 people in the mid 90's.....or even now go into sudan to prevent bloodshed or go into zimbabwe where robert mugabe is killing anyone who is opposed to him estimate so far over 100,000 people killed so far.
|
|
1/30/2005 6:21:00 AM
Hmm Being that i AM a US Marine currently in Iraq, i guess i should have ago at this... First of all, i understand that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, no matter how unintelligent it may be. Second, the CH-53 WAS brought down by a sandstorm. As someone who WAS here that day, the weather was horrible, the winds were picking up serious sand. As the Helo's (there were 2 flying together) began to lose visibility, they began to climb, as they began to climb, one of the Helos lost control. Yes these Helos are amazingly capable, however when you throw in the fact that they have been flying in Iraq for almost 2 years now, most of them only having had 6 months off, and then you take into account the effect of sand on anything, let alone the mechanics of a rotorwing assembly... it isnt that hard to believe. I have been here for 7 months, i have seen and conquered, the elections just ended, with a higher turn out then ANYONE expected. Coalition forces were no where near the polling centers. Iraqi forces provided front security, we simply backed them up... Until you have seen an Iraqi chil who for the first time in their life has shoes on their feet bc of you... dont talk about how much "worse" it is now then it used to be...
|
|
1/30/2005 12:05:00 PM
|
|
1/30/2005 12:11:00 PM
My buddy in the US is being sent to Iraq pretty soon. Why is an american life so much more important than an Iraqi's? Thats some bull**** right there.
|
|
1/30/2005 3:29:00 PM
|
|
1/30/2005 3:31:00 PM
|