CUT -vs- UNCUT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (last)
 CUT -vs- UNCUT
Jewce
Jewce Member (2393posts)
6/13/2005 7:11:00 PM
thanks xoticgibuu blush

xoticgibuu
xoticgibuu Member (28018posts)
6/13/2005 7:18:00 PM
^ yw how you doing?

Bassfreak
Bassfreak Promo Model (15712posts)
6/13/2005 7:34:00 PM
I remember getting with a girl who said "I would never put one of those things in my mouth" (refering to an uncut penis we were looking at on TLC).

Minutes later she was gobbling my uncut dong. Pull the skin back, they all look the same. She had no idea that she was smoking an 'ant eater'.

KRAZE
KRAZE Member (3544posts)
6/13/2005 8:07:00 PM
^
lmfo

xTwoOfHeartsx
xTwoOfHeartsx DJ/Artist (19486posts)
6/13/2005 9:52:00 PM
All penises are weird looking

Yes, they are odd looking body parts by default. But so are toes. And some are better looking than others.
In this case, cut penises tend to be more aesthetically pleasing, as opposed to uncut.

As for being cleaner and less stinky? Being cut has nothing to do with hygiene.

Yes, it does. If a guy doesn't have his foreskin, there is way less of a chance of bacteria growing there (which, in turn, causes odour).

Whether you're cut or un-cut, you're going to be dirty and stinky down there if you don't wash yourself. As long as you wash yourself, an un-cut penis should be as clean and smell-free as a cut one.

Yes, any man who doesn't wash will smell down there.. however, men with their foreskin are more likely to be odourous, no matter how often they wash -- simply because there is a little pocket there where excess urine, semen, and bacteria can get trapped. Circumcised men do not have this problem.
Sure, a circumcised man who doesn't wash at all is going to smell anyway.. but if he does wash, he's more likely to stay cleaner for longer.
Un-circumcised men have to wash more often to keep it clean.. and they have to make sure they clean well under the foreskin, as well as the rest of the penis.

I should know, Im un-cut

Actually, you wouldn't know, Dan; you have Phimosis wink

[for any of you who are curious as to what that means: http://www.circumstitions...om/Glossary.html#phimosis ]

And for those of you who are saying that penile sensitivity has nothing to do with whether or not a man is cut.. you are wrong, I'm afraid.
The foreskin is implicated in sexual pleasure, because it is full of touch receptors and nerve endings that respond to the movements of the penis during sex.
A man who doesn't have his foreskin may not be as sensitive as one who does, simply because of the absence of that piece of skin (and plenty of nerves).

Nac
Nac Member (19497posts)
6/13/2005 9:54:00 PM
^ Can't be said any better than that!

DanGogh
DanGogh Member (21348posts)
6/13/2005 10:02:00 PM
^^ you might wanna read up on a condition before saying someone has it. Kind of the same thing you do about yourself *lol* Anyways, that condition is when you can't pull the skin back due to it being attached to the glans.
I can pull my skin back fine, thank you *lol*

xTwoOfHeartsx
xTwoOfHeartsx DJ/Artist (19486posts)
6/13/2005 10:10:00 PM
You can? All the way? I bet you can't wink

Either way, you have a condition in which you cannot completely pull back your foreskin. I don't know why you're lying and saying you can pull it back just fine.. lol

DanGogh
DanGogh Member (21348posts)
6/13/2005 10:14:00 PM
how would you know? *L* You never have and never will see my dick *lol*

jenix
jenix Member (4200posts)
6/13/2005 10:14:00 PM
Everyone has a scent, whether we like it or not - suck it up! blush

xTwoOfHeartsx
xTwoOfHeartsx DJ/Artist (19486posts)
6/13/2005 10:17:00 PM
how would you know? *L* You never have and never will see my dick *lol

I have chosen to behave, and not comment on that wink

DanGogh
DanGogh Member (21348posts)
6/13/2005 10:18:00 PM
^ trying to grab it while ur in a drunken stupor doesnt count wink

Davis76
Davis76 Member (5183posts)
6/13/2005 10:27:00 PM
The last page contains WAY too much info about Danimals penis.

GreenTreeWater
GreenTreeWater Member (1032posts)
6/14/2005 1:06:00 AM
I read DawnaDarko's comment on the last page.

Guess what Treble, some one here with an uncut penis will take offense to it. And it was not a malicious put down, but a preference based on what she likes and a few facts.

Treble I'm sorry that I bug you, but I think you coming in here and annoucing that that people are overly sensitive about foreskin and other people are putting them down is a very boring and blanketing statement. It does not make a good read. Find me the most non-controverisial thread and I'll show you a jerk putting some one down. It happens every where. But for the most part this thread is doing ok. Some girl will speak up about what she likes and hates, and people will get offended accordingly, regardless of the girl's intention. Save a few yahoos, the thread is moving fine.

So I'm puzzled with your worries.

All this crap about it being more hygienic is bullsh!t.

Read dawna's last comment. But I'll meet you half way, modern men probably shower and clean themselves enough so that infection is a non-issue. Having said that, the chances of gaining infection from lack of hygene is much greater in uncut men. I'm not sure how you don't see this.

And so far the common arguement to the above is along the lines of "if they're not cleaning themselves, cut or not, then they have bigger issues to deal with" May I add that this is not a counter point.

tammytoes
tammytoes Moderator (17194posts)
6/14/2005 4:27:00 AM
I like cut better, with uncut sometimes there is a thing called "Dink Stink"

ah yes, I have named this condition "Dick Cheese". It's that funk that builds up under the foreskin after a days worth of work. Very uncool.


I'm all about circumcision. I have had both, and in all cases perfered the cut to the uncut.

Archon
Archon Member (3463posts)
6/14/2005 6:20:00 AM
While men may become defensive about one side or the other of this issue the arguement actually ends there. No western culture guy is going to go get circumcized by his own choice unless it is for a religious or medical reason.

Women probably already have a preference in mind based on their experience or their sexual upbringing. Similar to the size issue -it is likely to be secondary to other factors of attraction and relations. If she is really into you it is unlikely the aesthetics of your cock is going to be the deal breaker. Rather it may only contribute to her perception of you overall.

The only issue I can really see is a parental one: Parents wonder if the event is traumatic to the child's psych and while it might, can any cut man out there actually remember the event? Or anyone remember what happened in the first couple years of life?

The real issue here is parents making an irreversable surgical decision for their child. This decision is largely aesthetic and based on a personal bias. The growing trend is to not make this decision at all thus resulting in more uncut men.




GreenTreeWater
GreenTreeWater Member (1032posts)
6/14/2005 6:28:00 AM
^^ So men are getting cut because their parents are following what society says?, more so than any beneficial reason?

monkeypie
monkeypie Member (4473posts)
6/14/2005 6:47:00 AM
ah yes, I have named this condition "Dick Cheese". It's that funk that builds up under the foreskin after a days worth of work. Very uncool.


gross is all I can say, very, very gross, but funny at the same time.

Archon
Archon Member (3463posts)
6/14/2005 7:00:00 AM
the parent makes the decision for their child regardless- to do it or not to do it is still a decision. In as much as the guy isnt going to have it done unless it is for religious or medical reasons the decision not to have it done will "shape" his life.

I believe today's parents are afraid to make the decision for circumcision, they decide why subject their child to pain and possible mental trauma unnecessarily.. perhaps they feel if he wants to make that decision about his body he can do so himself later. Even though that isnt likely to happen.

I propose a theory that if the father of the child is active in the childs life and he himself is cut - chances are his son will be too.. if the mother of the child is the decision maker, the chances he will be uncut are greater. Just a theory - no study has been done to my knowledge to back this up.

I think the guys in this thread advocating one side or the other is ridiculous..and based almost entirely on ego or insecurity. personally I dont care whether another guy is cut or not. The only thing that matters to me is how I feel about myself and whether or not I can please her. (for some even that doesnt matter to them)


Bassfreak
Bassfreak Promo Model (15712posts)
6/14/2005 7:01:00 AM
From all that I have read CUT men have a higher risk of infection as the glans (the head of the dink) is exposed to chaffing, getting nicked and such leaving a wound where there is MUCH more potentially harmfull to partners and oneself. The foreskin is there for a REASON. I like the eyelid analogy from a few pages back. We should cut our eyelids off to avoid infection.

And OF COURSE a cut dink looks better to most girls as cut dinks or erect uncut dinks with the skin pulled back is what you all have seen all of your lives. A limp uncut dink is not plastered on the internet and in porn movies.

treble
treble Member (29207posts)
6/14/2005 11:03:00 AM
Guess what Treble, some one here with an uncut penis will take offense to it. And it was not a malicious put down, but a preference based on what she likes and a few facts.

Treble I'm sorry that I bug you, but I think you coming in here and annoucing that that people are overly sensitive about foreskin and other people are putting them down is a very boring and blanketing statement. It does not make a good read. Find me the most non-controverisial thread and I'll show you a jerk putting some one down. It happens every where. But for the most part this thread is doing ok. Some girl will speak up about what she likes and hates, and people will get offended accordingly, regardless of the girl's intention. Save a few yahoos, the thread is moving fine.

So I'm puzzled with your worries.


Your point?


This is what your response was to what I'd written:

Treble people are just sounding off on their preference. What are you talking about?

MY preference is for non of this to matter as much as it seems to.

It's like fat vs. slim, short vs. tall...all a matter of preference which is fine.

However, tall and slim are pushed on (particularly) Western society as being more attractive, more pleasing to the eye the same as a cut penis is.

I never once stated my preference, or that I even have one....I just think it's unfortunate that some people have these preconceived notions about an uncut penis being a bad thing.

You were born like that wtf.

perhaps they feel if he wants to make that decision about his body he can do so himself later. Even though that isnt likely to happen.

Maybe they realize it isn't necessary, although it does happen.
I know a man who chose to be circumcized in his early twenties because he felt self-concious.

I watched a documentary a while ago about circumcision, and the risk of there being complications is present...NAC touched on that before.

As a parent, you have to ask yourself if it's worth taking that risk.

I propose a theory that if the father of the child is active in the childs life and he himself is cut - chances are his son will be too.. if the mother of the child is the decision maker, the chances he will be uncut are greater. Just a theory - no study has been done to my knowledge to back this up.

I agree to an extent.
Some fathers insist that their sons be circumcized as they were, sometimes a result of being taught that being cut is preferable, sometimes simply so that father and son share that sameness.




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (last)
Wanna add a comment?

Or Sign up to Clubvibes