
|
8/2/2005 2:24:00 PM
|

|
8/2/2005 2:34:00 PM
News Corp. purchased Intermix Media Inc., the owner of MySpace, for $580 million last mont
holy moly....fcukin Tom
|

|
my_chanG
Nightlife Industry (19095posts)
8/2/2005 2:40:00 PM
word.
i heard they were gonna start charging but then adam said that's BS and don't believe it.
that's crazy tho, eh? he made a fucin killing.
|

|
8/2/2005 2:56:00 PM
wait till CV gets sold someday
|

|
8/2/2005 3:00:00 PM
|

|
8/2/2005 3:00:00 PM
You are absolutely crazy if you don't think News Corp. isn't going to eventually charge for MySpace. Just like Salon.com, ESPN.com, and other internet-driven content, you'll eventually have the option to get a feature-stripped, ad-laden version for free, or you'll be able to pay for the "premium" content without ads, and with the features you were getting for free in the first place.
14 million unique visitors a month is nothing to sneeze at. And the number of members that they'd lose because they'd have to start paying would be dwarfed by the number of subscribers they'll pick up because of the additional exposure they don't have now, especially with the Fox brand name behind it.
It's a great pick up for NewsCorp, because they now have access to 22 million subscribers to which they can deliver focused advertising content to. Think of getting friend requests bands, only instead of getting them from bands, you're getting them from one of Fox's new fall lineup shows, or from Bill O'Reilly. Imagine checking your messages, and getting an email from Detective Vic Mackey, urging you to watch "The Shield", only on FX! Or instead of trying to shoot ninjas on your homepage, you can throw darts at Joe Lieberman's head to win an XBox 360 (Actually, that wouldn't be so bad.).
It's great for NewsCorp. I'm not so positive it's great for the MySpace community.
|

|
8/2/2005 3:06:00 PM
|

|
8/2/2005 3:14:00 PM
^ so true (hopefully)
|

|
8/2/2005 3:21:00 PM
in the age of free music down loading, free MSN/AIM/Yahoo chat, and hundreds of free forums i just don't see people paying to be on myspace, especialy sense a great deal of the people are still on the tit....i mean some would of course but i not enough to make it worth it but what do i know, i'm just a dillhole who has boughtin 1 CD in 6 years.
|

|
8/2/2005 3:36:00 PM
100 million iTunes Music Store downloads would disagree with you. So would the Insiders at ESPN.com, and the IGN Videogame Insider Message Boards, both of which are paid boards. It has been shown repeatedly that the average consumer will pay for premium content.
Consider this: MySpace has 22 million members. Say they start charging, say, 5 bucks a month for access. You'll lose probably a third of your members right off the bat-but let's be generous and say they'll lose half of 'em. You'll keep the longtime members, the bands, and everyone who uses it for personal promotion. So now you're down to 11 million members. That's STILL 55 million dollars PER MONTH, and that's before you consider the influx of people who have NEVER heard about MySpace, but saw a commercial on FX and signed up, as well as the advertising dollars that it's going to bring in from delivering focused ad content to the end user.
MySpace has been running under the radar nationally for a long time. It's about to blow up, and Tom is about to make a crapload of money. Maybe I shouldn't have deleted him from my friends list.
|

|
8/2/2005 4:28:00 PM
My sense is that they won't charge you to be a member but they will charge you for some of the content. Just like Grab.com, which is owned by News Corp. I'm sure they don't want to lose members and this would be a way to keep many. As long as they don't take away too much of the free content. I could see them adding things like music downloads, game subscriptions, etc
|

|
K_BEEZ
Nightlife Industry (8074posts)
8/2/2005 5:35:00 PM
i think thats a simplistic view dwight. if they lose half off the bat, they will then lose half every month thereafter as well. soon, the sight would become non-relevent, or another would take its place.
anyone used NAPSTER lately?
|

|
8/2/2005 5:41:00 PM
holy **** better delete my account before they spam me
|

|
8/2/2005 5:56:00 PM
good logical points dwight
kirk makes a good point to
Would any of us go on myspace if only a few of our friends were willing to pay? it would be boring, we could just email or talk to them on MSN
Would it then turn into a 'dating' website? there are millions of those out there
I just can't see people paying for it unless it changed and provided some type of 'premium content'
|

|
Menuki
Administrator (23384posts)
8/2/2005 6:03:00 PM
|

|
8/2/2005 6:09:00 PM
^^ya but i wonder what % of those people know how to get free music?
|

|
Menuki
Administrator (23384posts)
8/2/2005 6:16:00 PM
^^ya but i wonder what % of those people know how to get free music?
But that's besides the point. Just because you know how to steal something doesn't mean you do.
|

|
8/2/2005 6:37:00 PM
Plus, *I* know how to steal music, yet I still buy music from the iTunes Music Store.
i think thats a simplistic view dwight. if they lose half off the bat, they will then lose half every month thereafter as well.
Yes, but just as many people would be joining the site as a pay site in my scenario.
|

|
8/2/2005 6:38:00 PM
|

|
Menuki
Administrator (23384posts)
8/2/2005 6:53:00 PM
so your saying that everyone knows how to get free music but choose not to?
*looks around* Where did I say that? You're using bitch logic now. Get your facts straight.
412,000 people compared to the 10's of millions of people online is absolutely nothing.
Keep in mind this is just the first year. And you are comparing one business. Add up the revenue of all these pay music sites and you have your 10's of millions.
Of course there will be millions of people that won't be willing to pay. But that doens't take away form the fact that there are millions that will.
|

|
8/2/2005 7:02:00 PM
*looks around* Where did I say that?
imply
To express or indicate indirectly
Once again, you missed the point. The original point was that the myspace would fail if people had to pay. K brought up Napster. I pointed out that Napster is making tens of millions even though it's a pay site.
who said i was making a statement regarding the 'orginal point'?
u implied that napster users know how to get free music but choose not to....i was pointing out that since the number of napster users compared to internet users is so small, that most napster users prolly don't know how to or understand the concept of DLing free music.
|